My Dearest friend
Perhaps we are finally moving toward what Gautam Buddha saw.
You
talk of the Quantum of Solace. But really isn’t that as ambitious as
talking of destiny? All those things you said about growth, aren’t they
also to be said about Solace? Even as you said “Quantum of Solace”, you
attached with it the words “quest & destiny”.
Existentialism
does not talk of “why are we here and what next in life”. It just talks
of this very stationary universe that an individual tries to build
around him. I believe that what Buddha saw was that one cannot
constantly keep “wanting something”. And that if you are free from
desires you finally see what life really is.
Don’t
ridicule me. Listen for a bit. Just because we have moved from
“material desires” to “philosophical desires” doesn’t mean we have
matured or seen life differently. It just means we have lived long
enough for material desires to become meaningless. It simply shows AGE
and not GRACE. So right now you have started wanting to discard
certain ideas about “growth” and adapt certain other ideas about
“solace” and stagnation. But that in no way implies your detachment. In
simple words, you now want alchemy to be at the forefront of your
desires, instead of … say food or academia.
So
this ambition of yours is just yet another way of trying to grow. Grow
out of something or grow into something. That is immaterial. But any
sort of change is threaded to growth. Negative or positive. Call it by
many new names. Call it destiny if you want. Call it solace if you may.
But motion itself is growth. Time grows, ideas grow, speed grows, you
grow, your mind grows, your desires grow, life grows. So until you have
achieved the stagnation that Buddha did, you might never discover what
it means to be outside of the circle of growth. I call it a circle
because you do tend to feel like you’re back where you started. And also
because going about it makes your head spin ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment